top of page

ALL POSTS

Field hockey occupies a unique place in Australian sport. It isn't as loudly celebrated as cricket or AFL, yet the Kookaburras and Hockeyroos are quietly two of the most successful national teams this country has ever produced. To understand how Australia became a genuine world power in hockey, it helps to go right back to the beginning — to British sailors, cow-pat-strewn parklands, and a handful of determined schoolgirls.


How It All Began: The British Navy's Unlikely Legacy


Most sports that took root in colonial Australia arrived via the British Army. Hockey is the exception. In the late 1800s, Australia had no naval fleet of its own and depended on the Royal Navy to patrol its coastline. It was British naval officers stationed here — not soldiers — who introduced the game to the local population, teaching the sailors' pastime to communities clustered around Australia's port cities.


No one can say with certainty exactly where or when the very first game was played on Australian soil. What we do know is that private girls' schools were already playing hockey by 1900, and informal matches were underway in New South Wales, South Australia and Tasmania from as early as 1901.



Hockey's formal structures sprang up quickly once the game caught on. The South Australian Hockey Association was formed in 1903, the same year Sydney's Wandah Club — founded by Miss Clubbe and her sister — became the first women's hockey club in the country. Forestville Hockey Club, also established in South Australia, is recognised as the oldest hockey club in Australia.


From there, the game spread state by state with associations forming from all through the early 1900s. Interestingly, hockey in Australia developed largely as a women's game in its earliest years, even as men's competitions began appearing around the turn of the century.


The National Hockey Teams


The Hockeyroos (Women)


Wayne Blazejczyk blog - Hockeyroos womens australian hockey team

Australia's women's national team played its first international match in 1914, against an England touring side — making it the older of Australia's two national programs by more than a decade. For decades afterwards, the national picture was shaped by fierce interstate rivalry: an interstate championship to crown the best state side began in 1946, and Western Australia dominated it almost completely between 1946 and 1967. That depth of state competition made — and still makes — selection for the national team brutally competitive.


The Kookaburras (Men)


Wayne Blazejczyk blog - kookaburras men australian hockey team

The men's side took longer to organise nationally. Although the need for a national men's body was recognised as early as 1912, it wasn't until 13 years later that it became reality. The Australian Hockey Association held its first council meeting in Sydney on 8 May 1925, with Queensland, New South Wales and Victoria represented, followed by its first AGM on 29 June 1925. At that meeting, just 54 teams were recorded playing hockey across the country — New South Wales led the way with 18 teams, followed by Victoria (17), Queensland (15) and South Australia (4).

Despite the association forming in 1925, Hockey Australia traces the Kookaburras' representative history back further still — to 1922, when Australian men first took the field in competitive international fixtures. Since then, more than 400 men have worn the Kookaburras jersey.


From Local Curiosity to Olympic Dominance


For much of the early-to-mid twentieth century, hockey remained a solid but modest part of the Australian sporting landscape — popular in schools and among club players, but far from a national obsession. That began to change dramatically in the second half of the century, as both national teams transformed into genuine global forces.

The Kookaburras built one of the most remarkable medal records in Australian Olympic history. They became the only Australian team in any sport to medal at six consecutive Summer Olympics (1992–2012), and finished in the top four at every Games between 1980 and 2012. Their overall Olympic résumé now includes:

  • Gold: 2004

  • Silver: 1968, 1976, 1992, 2020

  • Bronze: 1964, 1996, 2000, 2008, 2012

They've also won the Hockey World Cup three times (1986, 2010, 2014) and dominate the Hockey Champions Trophy with a record 15 titles — more than any nation in the sport's history.


The Hockeyroos arrived on the Olympic stage slightly later — women's hockey only entered the Games at Moscow 1980, and Australia didn't compete until Los Angeles 1984 — but once they did, they were sensational. From the late 1980s through to 2000, they sat at world No. 1 almost continuously, adding World Cup gold in 1994 and 1998 along the way. Their Olympic resume includes:

  • Gold: Seoul 1988, Atlanta 1996, and Sydney 2000.


A Legacy Still Being Written


More than a century after British naval officers first introduced the game and Sydney schoolgirls formed Australia's earliest club, hockey remains one of the country's most consistently successful international sports. In 2000, the women's and men's Australian Hockey Associations merged to create Hockey Australia which not only supports our impressive sportspeople but also supports communities through the Hockey Australia Foundation and leaves a legacy to proud of.

 
 


As a significant shareholder of FDCTech, Inc., Wayne Blazejczyk must stay aware of the business dealings of FDC’s subsidiary companies as their decisions may impact the fortune of the company and, therefore, the value of his stocks.


Australia-based FDC subsidiary Genesis Financial Inc. recently sold its mortgage brokering business, Interactive Mortgage and Finance Pty Ltd, to Haisto Consulting Pty Ltd. for $1.75 million, or AUD 2.3 million.


In a recent press release, FDC described the reasoning behind the divestment as such:


“Genesis has reached an agreement to divest its mortgage brokering business … to provide surplus capital to acquire complementary companies in wealth management, digital assets, and financial brokerage.”


FDC went on to explain the highlights of the deal in more detail through the following list:

  • Enables Genesis to concentrate on its core activities in the financial planning and advisory sectors in Australia.

  • Retains the ability of our 114 in-house financial advisors with over $540 million under advice and dealing group to cross-sell mortgage broking services through the Buyer.

  • Proceeds from the sale of IMF will enable FDCTech to acquire other profitable dealer groups in Australia, resulting in a positive step-change in revenue, assets under advice, and assets under management.

  • An ongoing relationship with the buyer, with a vast and robust distribution network, provides further organic growth opportunities and synergies.

Blazejczyk is confident about the new financial opportunities brought forth by the Genesis deal in light of this information. Not only will this deal bring forth potential growth for Genesis, but also in turn for FDC, as well; thus, benefiting all shareholders involved.


Additionally, the Executive Director of Australian operations at Genesis, Nick Brookes, provided the following statement regarding his perception of the agreement: “This transaction will realize a significant cash injection to the Australian subsidiary and enable us to focus on the core activities in line with FDCTech’s overall corporate acquisition strategy.”


Brookes continued with an uplifting message, “Our colleagues at Genesis should be commended for their efforts, along with those of our team, to achieve this turning point for the Australian operations.”


Thanks to this reassurance from Brookes and the important information provided by FDC, Wayne Blazejczyk is pleased with the announcement of the sale of IMF by Genesis. He looks forward to the future progress of FDCTech, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

For more information about Genesis and the future of FDCTech, you can read the full press release here.

 
 


Wayne Blazejczyk finance industry expert and field hockey athlete and coach, talks about how the Australian Securities and Investments Commissions warns about taking advice from “Fik Tok.” A 24-year-old Sydney woman who has over 15,000 followers from her posts and videos, seems to have all the right advice from things like cheap date ideas, to buying the right house, saving your first $100,000, and even investing in Dogecoin. She has worked as a financial manager and has accumulated close to $350,00 of assets in 5 years. She has become one of the finfluencers, social media content creators building an audience through dispensing financial advice.

Wayne Blazejczyk finance industry expert says becoming a finfluencer seems to be the lucrative trend these days, however the ASIC warns from taking advice from “Fik Tok.” First off, placing yourself as a financial advisor without a license can lead up to $135,000 and 5 years in prison. However, to become a finfluencer it requires no expertise at all. This is where it gets tricky. So, who then are you really following? An expert of someone who claims they are an expert, and you follow them, take the advice because they have tons of followers. Not smart.

Here are a few tips to assess the credibility of an influencer and their advice. First, do not assume that just because someone has a lot of followers that they should be followed. Do your homework. Research who this person is, what experience they have, check out their educational background do not just take it for granted that they are who they say they are and should be automatically qualified for their advice. Make sure there is evidence to back up their claims.

Also, if they are really making money and credited, then why would they give away all their secrets that made them rich for free? That makes no sense. You would think they might give you a taste of their tips in financial success but then charge you for the rest. If they have some strategy that beats the market, why are they on social media bragging about it? Anyone advertising a stock or product or financial strategy on social media should be questioned.

Last thing, just like the pyramid schemes, the “get rich quick” schemes you should be wary of them. It can be possible to make large ROIs, however taking advice from someone on social media is probably not telling you all the truth, unless they are trying to get you to try your chances as a finfluencer.



 
 

SUBSCRIBE VIA EMAIL

Thanks for submitting!

© 2021 by Wayne Blazejczyk

bottom of page